Skip to content

Conversation

@CoolatMax
Copy link

@CoolatMax CoolatMax commented Jan 30, 2026

Description

This PR addresses issue #15 by introducing a comprehensive SDK Methods Reference for the JavaScript SDK.

  • Previously, technical details were distributed across various tutorials. This new reference provides a centralized "source of truth" for developers, including:
  • Detailed Parameter Tables: Full breakdowns of types and required status for init(), setContext(), setParams(), and setAppCallbackUrl().
  • UI & Session Management: Documented options for triggerReclaimFlow() and startSession(), including callback handling for onSuccess and onError.
  • Return Values: Explicitly defined return types for core methods to improve developer experience.
  • Troubleshooting & Best Practices: A new section addressing common integration errors such as credential security and parameter mismatches.

Testing (ignore for documentation update)

  • Verified the MDX syntax using npm run build to ensure no broken tags or layout issues.
  • Validated the local development server using npm run dev to confirm the new page appears correctly in the sidebar and renders all tables as intended.

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Breaking change
  • Documentation update

Checklist:

Additional Notes:

Attached are screenshots of the new documentation page rendered in the browser:

  • Image 1
ss
  • Image 2
ss2
  • Image 3
ss3
  • Image 4 (Shows the sdk-methods.mdx file after all corrections)
ss4

@vercel
Copy link
Contributor

vercel bot commented Jan 30, 2026

@CoolatMax is attempting to deploy a commit to the Reclaim Protocol Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Jan 30, 2026

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 30, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds a new JavaScript SDK documentation page sdk-methods.mdx describing ReclaimProofRequest methods and updates the JS SDK docs navigation by inserting the new page into content/docs/js-sdk/meta.json.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
JS SDK Navigation & Page
content/docs/js-sdk/meta.json, content/docs/js-sdk/sdk-methods.mdx
Inserted a new sdk-methods entry into the JS SDK pages array and added a new MDX doc detailing ReclaimProofRequest SDK methods (init, setContext, setParams, setAppCallbackUrl) with parameters, return types, and examples.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

documentation

Suggested reviewers

  • kryptocodes
  • ChinmayMhatre

Poem

🐰 I nibble docs and hop with cheer,
A new page sprouts for devs to steer,
Init, context, params neatly penned,
A helpful guide from end to end,
Hop on, explore — the README’s here!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: adding comprehensive SDK methods reference documentation to the JavaScript SDK in response to issue #15.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 6

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@content/docs/js-sdk/sdk-methods.mdx`:
- Around line 12-17: Add missing detailed reference sections for
triggerReclaimFlow() and startSession(): document triggerReclaimFlow() as a
UI/session management method (what it opens, when to call it, return
values/promises, and side effects) and document startSession(sessionConfig,
callbacks) including explicit onSuccess(result) and onError(error) callback
parameter signatures, expected behaviors on ReclaimProofRequest
completion/failure, error handling strategies, and examples of how the SDK will
invoke these callbacks; also update the Methods Overview table to link to these
new sections so the table and detailed docs stay in sync.
- Around line 59-80: Remove the authoring/draft lines ("The Writing:", "This is
a 'Validation' method.", "Add this to your file:") so they don't appear in user
docs, and un-wrap the setParams() section by deleting the surrounding
```markdown ... ``` fence so the headings, table and descriptions render as
regular markdown; keep only the example code itself inside a proper
```javascript code block and ensure the setParams() heading and the parameter
table (including the `params` Record<string, string> row) remain as normal
markdown content associated with the setParams() documentation.
- Around line 56-58: The code block showing
reclaimProofRequest.setContext('user-wallet-address', 'session-id-12345'); is
missing its closing Markdown code fence; update the markdown around the example
(the line with reclaimProofRequest.setContext and the surrounding
triple-backtick opener) to add the closing ``` after the statement so the code
block is properly terminated and the following heading "The Writing:
setParams()" renders correctly.
- Around line 91-100: Close the unclosed JavaScript code block after the
setAppCallbackUrl example and remove the orphaned duplicate server-side snippet;
specifically, end the code fence immediately after
reclaimProofRequest.setAppCallbackUrl('https://my-backend.com/reclaim-webhook',
true) and delete the trailing duplicate ReclaimProofRequest.init(...) block
(references: reclaimProofRequest, setAppCallbackUrl, ReclaimProofRequest.init)
so the example is properly terminated and no incomplete/duplicated code remains.
- Around line 37-43: The MDX code block starting with the JavaScript example
that calls ReclaimProofRequest.init (the ReclaimProofRequest.init(...) snippet)
is missing a closing triple-backtick, causing the rest of the document to be
treated as code; fix by adding the closing ``` immediately after the example
(before the subsequent "## setContext()" heading) so the code fence is properly
terminated and MDX rendering succeeds.
- Line 8: The doc contains unsupported citation markers (e.g., [cite_start] and
[cite: 39, 40]) around the ReclaimProofRequest description that will render
literally; remove all occurrences of [cite_start] and [cite:] in this file
(including the malformed instances around "Your unique Application ID...",
"**Security Note:**...", "A unique identifier...", and "A message or
stringified...") or replace them with a supported citation pattern (e.g., plain
parenthetical references or markdown footnotes) consistently across the file;
alternatively, if you intend to keep citation syntax, add and configure a remark
plugin that processes these markers, but do not merge while the unsupported
markers remain.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants